Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether interest paid in the relevant year on an amount later treated by the Government as a loan was allowable as revenue expenditure, notwithstanding the assessee's mercantile system of accounting and the Revenue's contention that the liability had accrued in earlier years.
Analysis: Under the mercantile system, a provision can be made only when the liability has actually accrued and can be identified with reasonable certainty. Where the existence of liability itself, or its quantification, is uncertain, no provision can be compelled in earlier years. The assessee had been seeking adjustment of the outstanding amount against shares, and the possibility of interest liability arose only when the Government, years later, directed that the amount be treated as a loan carrying interest. The liability therefore became known and enforceable only in the relevant year, and payment made pursuant to that demand was a proper business expenditure of that year.
Conclusion: The interest payment was deductible in the relevant assessment year as revenue expenditure and not liable to disallowance on the ground of earlier accrual.