Penalty notice under sales tax law invalid where satisfaction was not formed in the course of proceedings under the Act.

Penalty under section 20A of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 can be initiated only where the authority forms the requisite satisfaction in the course of proceedings under the Act that the dealer concealed sales or filed incorrect particulars. Proceedings for production of accounts and information under section 14(1) are only aids to assessment and do not themselves amount to the relevant proceedings for invoking penalty. A notice may be issued during assessment proceedings if that statutory satisfaction arises there, but satisfaction reached solely from materials gathered behind the dealer's back is not sufficient and offends natural justice. On the stated facts, the penalty notice was invalid and liable to be quashed.

---

---

Issues: Whether a penalty notice under section 20A of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941 could validly be issued when the authority's satisfaction was reached on examination of books and documents under section 14(1), but not in the course of any proceedings under the Act.

Analysis: The power to impose penalty under section 20A is attracted only when, in the course of proceedings under the Act, the authority is satisfied that the dealer has concealed sales or furnished incorrect particulars in the return. Proceedings under section 14(1) for production of accounts and information are only steps in aid of assessment and do not themselves constitute the relevant proceedings for section 20A. The authority also rejected the contention that a penalty proceeding could be initiated only after completion of assessment, holding that notice may issue during assessment proceedings if the statutory satisfaction is formed in the course of such proceedings. However, on the facts, no notice under section 11 had been served and the impugned notice was not issued in the course of any proceeding under the Act. Satisfaction formed behind the dealer's back on materials obtained under section 14(1) was held insufficient, as such a process was not contemplated by section 11 and offended natural justice.

Conclusion: The penalty notice was invalid and liable to be quashed because the requisite satisfaction was not reached in the course of any proceedings under the Act.

---