Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the contract for fabrication, supply, erection and installation of rolling shutters was an indivisible works contract or a divisible composite contract comprising a sale of goods and a separate contract for erection and installation.
Analysis: The terms of the contract showed delivery ex works, rejection claims barred after delivery, risk during erection placed on the purchaser, and 90% of the consideration payable by the stage of delivery. The materials and shutters were manufactured by the assessee, delivered at its factory, and property in the goods passed on delivery. The balance 10% related to erection and installation, which was only incidental to the supply of the shutters and did not convert the entire transaction into a works contract. The surrounding circumstances and the nature of the installation work also indicated that the dominant object was supply of shutters, with a separate element of labour for fixing them at site.
Conclusion: The contract was a divisible composite contract consisting of two contracts, one for sale of the shutters and the other for erection and installation, and the sale component was liable to tax.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a contract for manufacture, supply and installation shows that property in the goods passes on delivery and the installation work is ancillary or separable, the transaction is a divisible composite contract rather than an indivisible works contract.