Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether, under section 18B(2) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 and rule 11(1A) of the Bombay Sales Tax (Exemptions, Set-off and Composition) Rules, 1954, the prescribed deduction of one per cent was to be computed on the sale price of the finished goods sold outside the State, or only on the value attributable to raw materials, packing materials and containers used in manufacture.
Analysis: The deduction was held to operate with reference to the finished product sold by the manufacturing dealer, not to a deemed or proportionate sale of the raw materials or packing materials consumed in its manufacture. The language of the rule, read as a whole, linked the relief to the sales tax payable on the dealer's sales of manufactured goods, and the references to the sale of the goods, their transportation outside the State, and the proviso concerning goods used as raw materials or packing materials all supported that construction. The alternative theory of notional sales of inputs was rejected as inconsistent with the wording of the rule and unnecessary for its operation. The same meaning was applied to section 18B(2), which used substantially similar language.
Conclusion: The one per cent deduction had to be calculated on the sale price of the finished goods manufactured or processed and sold outside the State, and not on only that part of the price attributable to locally purchased inputs.