Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the burden of proving that the goods sold by the assessee had been imported by him, and thus fell within the exception to taxation, lay upon the assessee under section 12-A of the U.P. Sales Tax (Amendment and Validation) Act, 1970, and whether that provision applied to the pending assessment proceedings.
Analysis: Section 12-A places the burden on the assessee to prove facts specially within his knowledge and specifically includes the existence of circumstances bringing a case within the exceptions and exemptions under section 3-A. The fact whether the match-boxes sold by the assessee were imported by him was within his special knowledge. Since he failed to produce purchase vouchers or give particulars of the selling dealers, the burden was not discharged. The provision was also retrospective by express legislative design and, in any event, was procedural in nature, so it applied to pending proceedings.
Conclusion: The burden of proof rightly rested on the assessee, and the challenge based on the earlier decision failed.
Final Conclusion: The applications were dismissed, leaving the assessment to tax undisturbed.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a taxing provision specifically places on the assessee the burden to prove facts within his special knowledge, that burden applies to pending proceedings and requires the assessee to establish entitlement to the exception or exemption claimed.