Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Handloom classified as machinery for taxation purposes, not as unclassified item.</h1> <h3>Jackard Machinery Works Versus Commissioner of Sales Tax</h3> The High Court of Allahabad held that handloom and its parts are considered machinery and machinery parts, not unclassified items, for taxation purposes. ... - The High Court of Allahabad held that handloom and its parts are considered machinery and machinery parts, not unclassified items, for taxation purposes. The court determined that handloom qualifies as machinery based on its function of converting yarn into cloth. The court referred to the common meaning of machinery and previous case law to support its decision. The court rejected the argument that handlooms should be assessed as timber products. The court ruled in favor of taxing handloom as machinery and awarded costs to the Commissioner of Sales Tax.