Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the seller was entitled to the concessional rate of tax under section 3(3) on production of the buyer's form XVII declaration, and whether the assessing authority could deny the concession by treating the goods as accessories rather than component parts.
Analysis: Section 3(3) grants a concessional rate where the statutory conditions are satisfied, including sale of goods to another dealer for use as component parts of goods mentioned in the First Schedule to be manufactured and sold inside the State. The prescribed declaration filed by the buyer satisfied the statutory requirement for the seller. Once the declaration in the prescribed form was produced, no further proof of collateral circumstances was necessary. The authority's view that the motors were only accessories did not displace the effect of the valid declaration, particularly when the goods formed part of the manufactured product.
Conclusion: The seller was entitled to the concessional rate of tax, and the denial of that concession was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the buyer furnishes the declaration required by section 3(3) in the prescribed form, the selling dealer is entitled to the concessional rate if the other statutory conditions are met, and no additional proof beyond the declaration is required.