Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the transaction under the varnish contract between the petitioners and the manufacturer was a sale of varnish so as to amount to a second sale in the hands of the petitioners and entitle them to deduction from assessable turnover.
Analysis: The contract, invoices, gate passes, and the course of conduct between the parties showed a transfer of property in finished varnish for valuable consideration in the course of business. The fact that the petitioners supplied some raw materials and that the invoices did not separately include their value did not alter the character of the transaction. A transaction does not cease to be a sale merely because the returned turnover of the earlier seller may have omitted part of the value of the goods, and the essential ingredients of a sale under section 2(h) were satisfied. The burden under section 10 stood discharged on the materials placed before the Court.
Conclusion: The transaction was a sale, the goods had already suffered tax at the first sale in the hands of the manufacturer, and the petitioners were entitled to treat their turnover as second sales and claim the statutory concession.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the substance of the transaction shows transfer of property in finished goods for consideration in the course of business, the transaction is a sale for sales tax purposes notwithstanding that the buyer supplied some materials or that the earlier seller's return did not include the full value of all inputs.