Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether inflated figures stated in an application to another department, while the actual raw material received and accounted for in the books remained correct, justified reassessment and penalty on the footing of suppression and escaped assessment under section 16 of the Tamil Nadu General Sales Tax Act, 1959.
Analysis: The assessee's books reflected the actual quantity of raw material received and used, and the allotments granted were duly recorded. The exaggerated figures in the quota application were made only to seek a higher import quota and were never accepted by the granting authority. In taxing law, moral impropriety in an application to another department does not by itself establish suppression of taxable turnover. The finding of the Tribunal that there was no suppression was a finding of fact, and no material was shown to justify reopening the concluded assessments merely on suspicion.
Conclusion: Reassessment and penalty were not warranted, and the challenge to the Tribunal's order failed.