Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the Tribunal was justified in refusing to state a case and refer the questions concerning levy of wealth-tax on vehicles owned by the assessee as business assets, including a trekker treated as a motor car, under section 40(3)(vii) of the Finance Act, 1983.
Analysis: Section 40(3)(vii) of the Finance Act, 1983 includes motor cars in the net wealth, while exempting only motor cars held as stock-in-trade in a business or motor cars registered as trucks and used in the business of running motor cars on hire. The vehicles in question were owned by the assessee for business use and were neither held as stock-in-trade nor used in a motor-car-hire business. On those admitted facts, the Tribunal held that no referable question of law arose and that the statutory provision plainly governed the levy.
Conclusion: The Tribunal was justified in declining to refer the questions of law, and the levy of wealth-tax on the vehicles was upheld.