Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the death of a partner, in the absence of a partnership clause providing for continuance of the firm, resulted in dissolution of the firm and justified separate assessments for the two accounting periods rather than a single assessment.
Analysis: The Tribunal had held that the case was not one of reconstitution within the meaning of section 187(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The governing principle applied was that where the partnership deed does not contain a term excluding dissolution on the death of a partner, the firm stands dissolved by operation of law under section 42 of the Partnership Act, and the later business arrangement constitutes a fresh firm or succession rather than a mere reconstitution.
Conclusion: The single assessment was not justified. The matter was correctly treated as involving dissolution of the old firm and the emergence of a new firm, warranting separate assessments; the answer was in favour of the assessee.