Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        1999 (12) TMI 14 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court upholds interest computation on accrual basis, aligning with statutory requirements and legislative intent. The court upheld the Assessing Officer's computation of interest on an accrual basis, ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee. The court ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Court upholds interest computation on accrual basis, aligning with statutory requirements and legislative intent.

                          The court upheld the Assessing Officer's computation of interest on an accrual basis, ruling in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee. The court clarified that interest must be computed on an accrual basis as mandated by Section 5 of the Interest-tax Act, despite the incorporation of Section 145 of the Income-tax Act into the Interest-tax Act. The decision ensured the effective operation of the charging section of the Interest-tax Act in alignment with statutory requirements and legislative intent.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Applicability of Section 145 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, to the computation of interest income under the Interest-tax Act, 1974.
                          2. Interpretation of "chargeable interest" under Section 5 of the Interest-tax Act in the context of the method of accounting employed by the assessee.

                          Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Applicability of Section 145 of the Income-tax Act, 1961:

                          The primary issue was whether, due to the incorporation of Section 145 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, into Section 21 of the Interest-tax Act, 1974, the interest income should be computed based on the method of accounting regularly employed by the assessee. The assessee argued that since it maintained its books of account on a cash basis and was assessed under the cash system under the Income-tax Act, the chargeable interest should also be computed on a cash basis for the Interest-tax Act. The Assessing Officer, however, computed the interest on an accrual basis, rejecting the cash system of accounting. The Tribunal upheld the Assessing Officer's computation, stating that Section 5 of the Interest-tax Act mandates the interest to be assessed on an accrual basis.

                          2. Interpretation of "Chargeable Interest" under Section 5 of the Interest-tax Act:

                          The court examined the scope of "chargeable interest" under Section 5 of the Interest-tax Act, which states that the chargeable interest of any previous year of a credit institution shall be the total amount of interest accruing or arising in that previous year. The court noted that Section 5 of the Interest-tax Act differs from Section 5 of the Income-tax Act, which includes income received or deemed to be received in India. The Interest-tax Act specifically refers to interest accruing or arising, not received. The court cited several precedents to elucidate the distinction between "accrue" and "arise" and their implications for tax liability.

                          The court emphasized that the inclusion of Section 145 in Section 21 of the Interest-tax Act does not alter the fundamental requirement that interest must be computed on an accrual basis as per Section 5 of the Interest-tax Act. The proviso to Section 145 of the Income-tax Act allows the Assessing Officer to determine the computation method if the accounts are correct but the method employed does not properly deduce income. Therefore, the Assessing Officer was justified in computing the interest on an accrual basis, aligning with the statutory requirements of the Interest-tax Act.

                          Conclusion:

                          The court concluded that the Tribunal's decision to uphold the Assessing Officer's computation of interest on an accrual basis was correct. The first question was answered in the affirmative, in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee. Consequently, the second question, which was of academic interest, was also treated as answered in favor of the Revenue and against the assessee. The court's interpretation ensured that the charging section of the Interest-tax Act remained operative and effective, aligning with the legislative intent and statutory framework.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found