Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a safety razor manufactured by the assessee could be classified as a cosmetic or a toilet requisite under item 6 of Notification No. 905/X, and thereby taxed at the higher single-point rate.
Analysis: The notification was issued under section 3-A of the U.P. Sales Tax Act and separately listed a number of specific goods, showing that the expression "cosmetics and toilet requisites" was not intended to be read in an unlimited dictionary sense. Although the word "toilet" is capable of a wide meaning, the context required the general words "toilet requisites" to be confined by the principle of ejusdem generis to articles of the same genus as cosmetics. On that construction, the entry covered toilet preparations and similar articles, but not tools, instruments, or devices such as razors. The alternative argument that the article must be usable without any outside aid was also not accepted as the decisive test, but the razor still failed to fall within the notified class. The ambiguity in the entry, if any, was also resolved in favour of the assessee.
Conclusion: A safety razor is neither a cosmetic nor a toilet requisite within item 6 of Notification No. 905/X. It is taxable under section 3 of the U.P. Sales Tax Act and not at the higher rate under section 3-A.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a taxing entry uses specific words followed by general words, the general words may be restricted by ejusdem generis to the same class as the specific words, and an ambiguous fiscal entry is construed in favour of the assessee.