2001 (3) TMI 88 - HC - Income Tax

Court restrains respondents from continuing assessment based on invalidated order under Income-tax Act, emphasizing Tribunal's decision.

The court ruled in favor of the petitioner, restraining the respondents from continuing assessment proceedings based on the invalidated Commissioner's ... Assessment, Revision Issues:Challenge to assessment proceedings under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.Analysis:The petitioner contested the assessment proceedings initiated by the Commissioner of Income-tax under section 263, which were deemed erroneous and prejudicial to Revenue's interests. The Tribunal overturned the Commissioner's order, setting aside the assessment. Despite this, the Assessing Officer issued fresh notices to the assessee to proceed with the assessment based on the Commissioner's order. The petitioner argued that since the Commissioner's order was set aside, no proceedings should continue. The court intervened, initially directing a halt to finalizing the assessment, but later allowing the assessment to proceed without immediate effect.Jurisdictional Dispute:The crux of the issue revolved around the jurisdiction of the Assessing Officer to continue with the assessment proceedings post the Tribunal's decision setting aside the Commissioner's order. The court ruled that the Assessing Officer cannot act on an order that no longer holds force, emphasizing that the Tribunal's decision supersedes the Commissioner's order. It was highlighted that administrative chaos would ensue if proceedings were allowed to continue based on an invalidated order.Limitation and Operative Orders:The judgment addressed the argument regarding the limitation period under section 155(2A) for completing assessments post the Commissioner's order. The court refrained from delving into the limitation aspect due to the pending nature of the proceedings. It stressed that the Assessing Officer is bound by the Tribunal's decision, and any attempt to proceed with the assessment based on an annulled order would be invalid.Final Decision:Concluding the analysis, the court allowed the petition, restraining the respondents from furthering the assessment proceedings based on the Commissioner's order under section 263. The ruling emphasized the supremacy of the Tribunal's decision over the invalidated Commissioner's order, safeguarding against arbitrary administrative actions.