Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Don't have an account? Register Here
<h1>Court upholds deduction for replacing worn-out ring frames under 'Current repairs'</h1> <h3>Commissioner Of Income-Tax Versus Tuticorin Spinning Mills Ltd.</h3> The High Court of Madras dismissed the Revenue's petition seeking a reference from the Tribunal's order. The Tribunal's decision to allow the deduction of ... Reference, Capital Or Revenue Expenditure The High Court of Madras dismissed the Revenue's petition seeking a reference from the Tribunal's order. The Tribunal's decision to allow the deduction of amounts spent on replacing worn out ring frames under 'Current repairs' was upheld, citing a previous court ruling that such expenditure is not capital in nature. The Revenue's argument that the replacement cost should be treated as capital expenditure was rejected.