Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether payment of the amount determined under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme, 1998 by cheque is to be treated as payment on the date of presentation of the cheque or on the date of its realisation, for the purpose of compliance with the 30-day period under section 90(2) of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998.
Analysis: The Scheme required the declarant to pay the sum determined within 30 days of the designated authority's order. The Court held that the provision prescribed the time for payment but did not lay down any special mode requiring actual credit into the Government account within that period. Rule 80 of the Central Treasury Rules recognises payment by cheque as deemed made on the date of presentation if the cheque is honoured, and no contrary condition was imposed by section 90(2). The cheque tendered by the petitioner was not dishonoured, and the mere fact that it was realised later did not defeat the statutory payment requirement.
Conclusion: Payment by cheque had to be treated as payment on the date of presentation of the cheque. The petitioner's payment was therefore within time, and the refusal to grant the certificate under the Scheme was illegal. The writ petition was allowed in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a statute requires payment within a prescribed time but does not insist on actual realisation, an honoured cheque tendered within that period constitutes payment on the date of presentation.