Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court upholds sales tax on cinema projector & Gandhi film sale</h1> <h3>Projection of India Pictures Versus The State of Madras</h3> The court upheld the assessment of sales tax on the sale of a cinema projector and the negative film 'Tour of Mahatma Gandhi.' It found that both sales ... - Issues Involved:1. Assessment of sales tax on the sale of a cinema projector.2. Assessment of sales tax on the sale of the negative film 'Tour of Mahatma Gandhi.'Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Assessment of Sales Tax on the Sale of a Cinema Projector:The assessee contended that the cinema projector, purchased in 1946 and used for several years for exhibiting educational films, should be exempt from sales tax when sold. The argument was based on the premise that the projector was treated as a capital good by Income-tax Authorities, allowing depreciation. The assessee argued that such sales should be dissociated from his business activity.The court reviewed several precedents to determine whether the sale was part of the business activity. In Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Coimbatore Division v. Sri Lakshmi Saraswathi Motor Service, it was held that isolated transactions of selling unserviceable buses did not make the assessee a dealer in buses. Similarly, in State of Bombay v. Ahmedabad Education Society, the court held that selling surplus bricks did not constitute carrying on the business of selling or supplying goods.However, the court found that the intention to sell projectors was present when the assessee acquired them. The court emphasized that the interval of time during which the projectors were used for exhibitions did not negate the intention to sell them when advantageous. The court cited Ebrahim & Co. v. The State of Bombay, where the sale of a ship was deemed part of the business activity due to its reasonable connection with the business.The court concluded that the sale of the projector had a reasonable connection with the assessee's business activities, and the essential ingredients of a sale in the course of business activity existed. Therefore, the sale of the projector was subject to sales tax.2. Assessment of Sales Tax on the Sale of the Negative Film 'Tour of Mahatma Gandhi':The assessee argued that the sale of the negative film, taken in 1946 and sold after eight years, was not in the course of business. The film was used to produce positives for sale, and the negative was eventually sold to Gandhi Samarak Nidhi for preservation.The court examined the nature of the assessee's business, which involved selling cinematographic goods, including positives of films. The court noted that the assessee's business was carried on with a profit motive, and the sale of positives was part of this business. The court found that the sale of the negative film had a reasonable connection with the assessee's business activities. The court cited United Bleachers Ltd. v. State of Madras, where the sale of packing materials used in the business was deemed part of the business activity.The court concluded that the sale of the negative film was part of the assessee's business activity, as the profit motive was present, and the sale had a reasonable connection with the business. Therefore, the sale of the negative film was subject to sales tax.Conclusion:The court dismissed the revision case, upholding the assessment of sales tax on both the sale of the cinema projector and the sale of the negative film 'Tour of Mahatma Gandhi.' The court found that both sales were reasonably connected to the assessee's business activities and were conducted with a profit motive, thereby attracting the levy of sales tax. The petition was dismissed with no order as to costs.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found