Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the sale of goods supplied under the contract was completed within West Bengal so as to attract sales tax, or whether it was exempt as an outside-State or inter-State sale.
Analysis: The contract contemplated delivery at Calcutta to the inspecting authority, who acted for acceptance of the goods, and payment was claimed in full immediately after such delivery and inspection. The obligation to forward the goods to Kanpur did not rest on the seller; it was only a subsequent matter for the Government, and the seller's duty ended on local delivery and certification. On the facts, there was no contractual movement of goods from one State to another as part of the sale transaction, and the subsequent despatch, if any, was not shown to be part of the seller's obligation. The property in the goods passed on delivery and approval in West Bengal, so the sale was neither outside the State nor exempt under Article 286.
Conclusion: The sale was completed within West Bengal and was liable to sales tax; the claimed exemption was not available.