Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether a firm registered as a dealer under the Hyderabad General Sales Tax Act could be validly assessed to sales tax for a period when it carried on business, even though it had been dissolved before the assessment order was made.
Analysis: The petitioners' firm had carried on business during the relevant period and had become liable to tax for that business. Assessment proceedings had commenced before dissolution and continued thereafter without any intimation of dissolution being given to the Sales Tax Officer, although rule 35 required such notice within thirty days. A firm is only a compendious name for its partners and does not lose liability for tax on dissolution. The absence of notice of dissolution meant that the assessing authority did not act without jurisdiction in completing the pending assessment.
Conclusion: The firm could be assessed after dissolution, and the challenge to the assessment failed.