Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :
        Central Excise

        2006 (9) TMI 62 - AT - Central Excise

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal remands appeals for fresh adjudication on duty demands & penalties. Authorities to re-quantify demands & reconsider penalties. The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and remanded all appeals for fresh adjudication. The adjudicating authorities are to re-quantify the demands of ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Tribunal remands appeals for fresh adjudication on duty demands & penalties. Authorities to re-quantify demands & reconsider penalties.

                          The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and remanded all appeals for fresh adjudication. The adjudicating authorities are to re-quantify the demands of duty and reconsider penalties in light of the Tribunal's interpretation of the exemption notifications and the non-retrospective effect of the amendment brought by Notification No. 69/97-C.E. The authorities are instructed to pass fresh speaking orders in accordance with law and principles of natural justice.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Liability to pay excise duty on intermediate products (plastic sheets and layflat tubing) captively consumed in the manufacture of final products.
                          2. Applicability of various exemption notifications, specifically Notification No. 4/97-C.E., 16/97-C.E., 38/97-C.E., and 67/95-C.E.
                          3. Retrospective effect of amendments to Notification No. 16/97-C.E. by Notification No. 69/97-C.E.
                          4. Inclusion of the value of intermediate products in the aggregate value of clearances for determining concessional rates under SSI exemption notifications.
                          5. Imposition of penalties under Rules 173Q and 209 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944.
                          6. Invocation of the extended period of limitation and imposition of penalties under Section 11AC of the Central Excise Act.

                          Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Liability to Pay Excise Duty on Intermediate Products:
                          The appellants did not pay excise duty on intermediate products (plastic sheets and layflat tubing) captively consumed in manufacturing final products, claiming exemptions under various notifications. The lower authorities demanded duty on these intermediate products, stating that the final products were cleared without payment of duty.

                          2. Applicability of Exemption Notifications:
                          - Notification No. 4/97-C.E.: Provided 'nil' rate of duty for final products, subject to non-availment of input duty credit.
                          - Notification No. 16/97-C.E. and 38/97-C.E.: Provided SSI exemptions but required inclusion of the value of intermediate products in the aggregate value of clearances.
                          - Notification No. 67/95-C.E.: General exemption for intermediate products captively consumed, but not applicable if final products were cleared without payment of duty.

                          3. Retrospective Effect of Amendments:
                          The amendment to Notification No. 16/97-C.E. by Notification No. 69/97-C.E. introduced clause (f) to para 5, which stated that intermediate products would not be deemed exempt if the final products were cleared at 'nil' rate or were exempt under any other notification. The Tribunal held that this amendment was not retrospective, thus not applicable to the period before 3-12-1997.

                          4. Inclusion of Intermediate Products' Value in Aggregate Clearances:
                          The authorities included the value of intermediate products in the aggregate value of clearances for determining concessional rates under SSI notifications. The Tribunal found that prior to 3-12-1997, such inclusion was not permissible as intermediate products were deemed exempt under para 3(c) of Notification No. 16/97-C.E.

                          5. Imposition of Penalties:
                          Penalties were imposed under Rules 173Q and 209 of the Central Excise Rules, 1944. The Tribunal's decision to remand the cases for re-quantification of duty implies that penalties will also be reconsidered in light of the correct interpretation of the notifications.

                          6. Extended Period of Limitation and Penalties under Section 11AC:
                          In the case of M/s. Sakthi Plastics, the department's appeal contested the non-imposition of penalty under Section 11AC and the shortfall in the duty amount. The Tribunal directed the adjudicating authorities to reconsider the issues of time-bar and penalties afresh.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal set aside the impugned orders and remanded all appeals for fresh adjudication. The adjudicating authorities are to re-quantify the demands of duty and reconsider penalties in light of the Tribunal's interpretation of the exemption notifications and the non-retrospective effect of the amendment brought by Notification No. 69/97-C.E. The authorities are instructed to pass fresh speaking orders in accordance with law and principles of natural justice.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found