Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the transactions between the appellants, the mills and third-party buyers amounted to two separate sales liable to sales tax, or merely an assignment of contractual rights or novation so as to avoid tax.
Analysis: The contract with the mills was initially for future goods, but on the goods coming into existence and being appropriated, property passed to the appellants, who then dealt with their own buyers as sellers. Delivery through mill letters to the ultimate buyers was only in execution of the chain of contracts and operated as delivery on behalf of the appellants, not as a mere transfer of a contract. The original contract with the mills remained intact, the mill letters were only instructions for delivery to nominees, and the ingredients of novation under section 62 of the Indian Contract Act were absent because there was no substitution of a new contract or extinction of the original liabilities.
Conclusion: The transactions constituted separate sales and not a novation or mere assignment of contracts; the sales tax assessment was therefore valid against the assessees.
Ratio Decidendi: Where goods are appropriated under a chain of contracts and delivery is made through nominees or delivery instructions without substituting the original contract, the intermediate buyer is treated as having effected a sale, and novation is not established unless the original contractual liabilities are extinguished and replaced by a new contract.