Deeming local sale of ores in the taxing State sustained despite later export delivery and incidental Central overlap.

Goods present in Orissa when the contract of sale was made could be treated as a local sale under the Orissa Sales Tax Act's deeming provision, even though the ores were to be extracted later and delivered for export through Calcutta. The Court reasoned that the contract concerned ores situated in the taxing State at the relevant time, so sales tax was validly attracted and the later mode of delivery did not defeat the levy. Applying pith and substance, it further found the tax law to be a sales measure within the State field, with only incidental overlap on export-related Central subjects. The assessment was therefore sustained.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether sales tax was leviable on the turnover arising from the contract for sale of ores which were in the mines in Orissa at the time of the agreement and were ultimately delivered for export through Calcutta; (ii) Whether the levy was invalid because the goods were intended for export and the State law incidentally touched a Central subject.

Issue (i): Whether sales tax was leviable on the turnover arising from the contract for sale of ores which were in the mines in Orissa at the time of the agreement and were ultimately delivered for export through Calcutta.

Analysis: The statutory definition of sale under section 2(g) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947 contained a deeming proviso that treated a sale as taking place in Orissa if, at the time of the contract of sale, the goods were actually in Orissa. The Court held that the ores formed the subject-matter of the contract while they were in Orissa, and that the fact that they had to be extracted later or were delivered to the buyer only at Calcutta did not prevent the proviso from operating. The Court also rejected the contention that the goods must already exist as movable goods at the date of the contract, holding that a contract for ores to be extracted and delivered could still be a contract for sale of goods for the statutory purpose.

Conclusion: Sales tax was properly attracted on the transaction and the levy was upheld against the assessee.

Issue (ii): Whether the levy was invalid because the goods were intended for export and the State law incidentally touched a Central subject.

Analysis: The Court applied the doctrine of pith and substance and held that the legislation was, in essence, a tax on sales falling within the Provincial field. Any impact on export or customs competence was only incidental. Relying on the principle of sufficient nexus, the Court held that the presence of the goods in Orissa at the time of the agreement gave the State a valid basis to tax the sale notwithstanding that the completed transfer occurred later and the goods were exported abroad.

Conclusion: The levy was constitutionally valid and was not invalidated by any incidental overlap with Central subjects.

Final Conclusion: The assessment to sales tax was sustained, and the applications challenging it failed.

Ratio Decidendi: Where goods are present in the taxing State at the time of the contract of sale, a deeming provision may validly treat the transaction as a local sale if there is sufficient nexus, and the levy remains valid even though the goods are later exported and the legislation only incidentally overlaps with a Central subject.

---