Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court upholds validity of assessment order under Sales Tax Act, affirms legislative power on exports</h1> <h3>Malcolm Angus Tulloch Versus The Revenue Commissioner, Sambalpur and Others</h3> The court upheld the validity of the assessment order by the Board of Revenue, dismissing challenges by the petitioner. It affirmed the applicability of ... - Issues Involved:1. Validity of the assessment order by the Board of Revenue.2. Applicability of the Orissa Sales Tax Act to transactions conducted in 1948-49.3. Definition and interpretation of 'sale' under Section 2(g) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act.4. Jurisdiction and legislative power concerning sales tax on goods meant for export.5. Determination of the correct turnover for sales tax assessment.Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:1. Validity of the Assessment Order by the Board of Revenue:The petitioner challenged the order of the Member, Board of Revenue, dated 10th July 1952, which declined to revise the sales tax assessment. The petitioner had also filed an application under Article 226 of the Constitution to quash the assessment order. The court noted that the petitioner admitted the facts regarding the sales to the American firm and the role of the Chromite Corporation of India as selling agents. The Sales Tax Officer, on appeal, held that the price paid by the American firm to the Chromite Corporation was the real sale price, a decision upheld by the Collector of Commercial Taxes and the Member, Board of Revenue. The court found no error in the assessment order and dismissed the applications.2. Applicability of the Orissa Sales Tax Act to Transactions Conducted in 1948-49:The transactions in question occurred before the Constitution's commencement, in the district of Keonjhar, a former Native State. The Orissa Sales Tax Act, which came into force in 1947, was applied to the merged States, including Keonjhar, through appropriate notifications. The court referenced Supreme Court decisions that affirmed the applicability of the Act to the merged States, thus validating the Act's application during the relevant period.3. Definition and Interpretation of 'Sale' under Section 2(g) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act:The court examined the definition of 'sale' under Section 2(g) of the Act, which includes any transfer of property in goods for valuable consideration, with a specific proviso deeming sales to have taken place in Orissa if the goods were in Orissa at the time of the contract. Despite the goods being in their natural state in Orissa at the time of the contract, the court held that the sale must be deemed to have taken place in Orissa for tax purposes, citing the Supreme Court's endorsement of the nexus theory in similar cases.4. Jurisdiction and Legislative Power Concerning Sales Tax on Goods Meant for Export:The petitioner argued that the proviso to Section 2(g) was invalid under the Government of India Act, 1935, as it affected exports, a Central subject. The court dismissed this contention, emphasizing the 'pith and substance' doctrine, which considers the primary subject matter of legislation. The Act, being a tax on sales, was within the provincial jurisdiction, and incidental encroachment on Central subjects did not invalidate it. The court referenced the Supreme Court's reasoning in Tata Iron & Steel Company's case, affirming the sufficient nexus for the State to tax the sale.5. Determination of the Correct Turnover for Sales Tax Assessment:The court upheld the assessment of the turnover at Rs. 1,45,070-5-0, the price paid by the American firm, rather than the lower amount shown in the petitioner's accounts. The Chromite Corporation of India acted as selling agents, and there could be no sale between the petitioner and his agents. Hence, the amount paid by the American firm was deemed the correct sale price for tax assessment.Conclusion:The court concluded that the petitioner was rightly assessed to sales tax and dismissed both applications with costs. The judgment affirmed the validity of the assessment order, the applicability of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, the interpretation of 'sale,' the legislative jurisdiction concerning sales tax on exports, and the determination of the correct turnover for assessment.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found