Place of passing title in groundnut sales determined sales tax liability; transactions were held outside Madras.

Taxing nexus under the Madras General Sales Tax Act depended on where property in the groundnut goods passed under the sale contracts. In the Bombay transactions, delivery terms at Marmagoa, weighment and quality acceptance, payment against railway receipts, and the use of railway consignment in the buyer's name showed that title was not intended to pass unconditionally in Madras, so the sales were outside the State. In the arthia transactions, the contract structure, port-pass terms, inspection and rejection rights, and the absence of direct privity between constituent and assessee led to the same result. The assessee was therefore not liable to sales tax on either class of transactions.

---

---

Issues: Whether the property in the groundnut sales passed within the State of Madras so as to attract sales tax liability under the Madras General Sales Tax Act.

Analysis: The taxing nexus depended on where property in the goods passed under the contract of sale. In the Bombay sales, the contracts, delivery at Marmagoa, acceptance after weighment and quality check, and payment of the major part of the price against railway receipts at Bombay showed that the railway consignment in the buyer's name was intended to meet export restrictions and obtain railway priority, not to effect an unconditional transfer of title. The facts therefore negatived passing of property in Madras. In the arthia transactions, the agreement and the incorporated port-pass terms likewise treated the arthias as sellers in relation to the trader, with payment structure, inspection, rejection rights, and the absence of a direct contractual link between the constituent and the assessee leading to the same conclusion.

Conclusion: The sales were not completed in Madras and the property in the goods did not pass within the State; the assessee was not liable to sales tax on either class of transactions.

---