Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court sets aside judgment, sales to Ministry not tax-exempt. Clarifies specific exemption criteria.</h1> <h3>The Commercial Tax Officer and Another Versus Shree Ganesh Jute Mills Ltd.</h3> The Commercial Tax Officer and Another Versus Shree Ganesh Jute Mills Ltd. - [1953] 4 STC 298 (Cal) Issues Involved:1. Maintainability of the appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent.2. Interpretation of Section 5(2)(a)(iii) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941.3. Applicability of the exemption from sales tax for sales made to the Ministry of Industry and Supply.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Maintainability of the Appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent:The preliminary objection raised by the respondents was whether an appeal lies to the High Court against the judgment of a single judge exercising jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution. The Constitution does not explicitly provide for an appeal from decisions under Article 226. However, it was argued that principles laid down in the National Telephone Co.'s case and reaffirmed by the Privy Council in Adaikappa Chettiar v. Chandrasekhara Thevar apply, allowing an appeal if the judgment falls within Clause 15 of the Letters Patent. Clause 15 allows an appeal from the judgment of a single judge unless it is passed in the exercise of appellate, revisional, or criminal jurisdiction.The court concluded that the exercise of jurisdiction under Article 226 is original jurisdiction, and thus, an appeal lies from the judgment of a single judge exercising this jurisdiction. The rule and determination under which the single judge exercised jurisdiction were pursuant to Article 225 of the Constitution, which preserved the powers originally given by Section 108 of the Government of India Act, 1915. Therefore, the judgment of Bose, J., was appealable under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent.2. Interpretation of Section 5(2)(a)(iii) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941:The core issue was whether the sales made by Messrs. Shree Ganesh Jute Mills Ltd. to the Ministry of Industry and Supply could be considered sales to the Supply Department of the Government of India under Section 5(2)(a)(iii) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941, thereby exempting them from sales tax. The statute provides that 'taxable turnover' excludes sales to the Indian Stores Department, the Supply Department of the Government of India, and any railway or water transport administration.The court analyzed the historical context, noting that the Supply Department ceased to exist on January 6, 1946, and was replaced by the Department of Industries and Supplies, later re-designated as the Ministry of Industry and Supply. The court held that the newly created department was not the same as the old Supply Department, despite taking over some of its functions. The specific mention of the Supply Department in the statute indicated a legislative intent to limit the exemption to sales to that department alone.3. Applicability of the Exemption from Sales Tax for Sales Made to the Ministry of Industry and Supply:The respondents argued that the sales to the Ministry of Industry and Supply should be exempt as this ministry took over the functions of the old Supply Department. However, the court held that the exemption was specifically for sales to the Supply Department and not to any other department, even if it performed similar functions. The court emphasized that taxation statutes should be construed strictly, and any ambiguity should benefit the taxpayer. However, exemptions from taxation should not be extended beyond the clear language of the statute.The court concluded that the sales in question were not to the Supply Department of the Government of India and thus could not be excluded in calculating the taxable turnover. Consequently, the appeal was allowed, and the order of Bose, J., was set aside, reinstating the demand for sales tax.Conclusion:The appeal was allowed with costs, and the judgment of Bose, J., was set aside. The sales made by Messrs. Shree Ganesh Jute Mills Ltd. to the Ministry of Industry and Supply were not exempt from sales tax under Section 5(2)(a)(iii) of the Bengal Finance (Sales Tax) Act, 1941.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found