Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Commissioner ordered to refer case to High Court for assessment legality under Orissa Sales Tax Act.</h1> The court required the Commissioner to state a case and refer it to the High Court to determine the legality of the assessment under the Orissa Sales Tax ... - Issues Involved:1. Jurisdiction and applicability of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947.2. Limitation period for filing a petition against the refusal to state a case.3. Legality of the assessment based on the definition of 'sale' under the Orissa Sales Tax Act.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Jurisdiction and Applicability of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947:The petitioners, a limited company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, with their head office in Calcutta, were engaged in the business of bamboos and Sabaigrass, supplying these to various paper mills. Despite conducting business for a long period, they did not register under Section 9 of the Orissa Sales Tax Act. The Sales Tax Officer issued a notice under Section 12, clause (5), of the Act, which the firm contested, claiming that the sales occurred outside Orissa and thus were not taxable in Orissa. However, the Sales Tax Officer assessed a tax of Rs. 3,215-10-0 based on a letter from the Collector of Commercial Taxes, which stated that the export of bamboos to Bengal constituted a 'sale' in Orissa and attracted sales tax liability. The Commissioner upheld this assessment, presuming that the sales were completed in Orissa due to the collection and dispatch of goods from Orissa, despite the petitioners providing no evidence to the contrary.2. Limitation Period for Filing a Petition Against the Refusal to State a Case:A preliminary objection was raised regarding the petition being time-barred. The refusal to state a case was dated 30th July, 1951, and the petition was filed on 28th September, 1951. Under Section 24 (2) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, the petition should be filed within 30 days of such refusal. The petitioners contended that the limitation period should start from the communication date of the refusal, not the signing date. The refusal was communicated on 9th August, 1951, and received on 13th August, 1951. The court agreed, stating that 'refusal' implies 'communicated refusal,' supported by the Madras High Court decision in Muthiah Chettiar v. Commissioner of Income-tax, Madras, which held that limitation should not commence before the aggrieved party knew of the order. The court further allowed the computation of the period taken to obtain copies of the order, granting an additional 22 days, making the petition timely.3. Legality of the Assessment Based on the Definition of 'Sale' under the Orissa Sales Tax Act:The main contention was the legality of the assessment, arguing that a mere contract for sale within Orissa does not constitute a sale under the Orissa Sales Tax Act. The assessment was based on the Sales Tax Officer's order and the Collector's letter, which incorrectly deemed mere export as sufficient to constitute a sale. The court found merit in the argument that a mere contract for sale is executory and does not transfer ownership, whereas a sale is an executed contract transferring complete ownership. The second proviso in Section 2(g) of the Orissa Sales Tax Act, deeming a contract for sale as a sale, was considered ultra vires, as it extended the meaning of 'sale' beyond the Government of India Act, 1935, which only allowed taxation on completed sales. The court cited the Allahabad High Court decision in Budh Prakash Jai Prakash v. Sales Tax Officer, Kanpur, which distinguished between an agreement to sell and a sale, supporting the view that only completed sales are taxable. The Commissioner's finding that sales were completed in Orissa was deemed a presumption without material evidence.Conclusion:The court required the Commissioner, Northern Division, Sambalpur, to state a case and refer it to the High Court on the point of whether the assessment was legal based on the position that a mere contract for sale and export from Orissa suffices for taxation under the Orissa Sales Tax Act, 1947. The petition was allowed.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found