TaxTMI Login
🎉 Festive Offer: Flat 15% off on all plans! →⚡ Don’t Miss Out: Limited-Time Offer →
TaxTMI 
Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>CESTAT Mumbai dismisses appeal delay application, citing lack of valid explanation. Legal precedents referenced.</h1> <h3>AMRI INDIA PVT. LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., AURANGABAD</h3> The CESTAT, Mumbai dismissed the application for condonation of delay in filing an appeal against an order dated 15-10-2007 by the Commissioner (Appeals). ... Appeal to Appellate Tribunal - Limitation The appellate tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, consisting of Justice R.M.S. Khandeparkar and Shri A.K. Srivastava, heard an application seeking condonation of delay in filing an appeal against an order dated 15-10-2007 passed by the Commissioner (Appeals). The applicant argued that they were unaware of the proceedings until they received a notice from the department in September 2008, and that they believed the matter was being contested by another party until that time. However, the tribunal found that the applicants were fully aware of the proceedings between the department and the other party, Ariane, as evidenced by various documents and communications. The tribunal noted that the applicants were informed about the proceedings by Ariane and had the opportunity to challenge the order in question. The tribunal also observed that the applicants failed to provide a valid explanation for the delay in filing the appeal. Ultimately, the tribunal dismissed the application for condonation of delay, citing insufficient cause. The decision referenced specific legal cases and guidelines related to the issue of delay in filing appeals.
TaxTMI 
