1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appeal outcome: Confiscation order upheld, penalties reduced. Duty demand sustained for period with reduced penalty.</h1> The appeal was disposed of with the confiscation order upheld, but the redemption fine and penalties were reduced. The demand for duty was sustained for a ... Clandestine removal - Proof - Demand - Limitation - Confiscation, fine and penalty - Penalty - Quantum of Issues:Investigation findings, Seizure of goods, Show cause notices, Duty demand, Penalties, Appeal against orders, Confiscation of goods, Redemption fine, Reduction of penalties, Demand of duty period.Analysis:Investigation Findings:- Officers found appellant-company not registered with Excise authorities.- Goods valued at Rs. 1,53,337/- seized for exceeding exemption limit.- Show cause notices issued for confiscation, duty demand, and penalties.- Second notice demanded duty of Rs. 41,520/- and imposed penalties.Seizure of Goods:- Goods seized as manufacturing unit not registered and not in records.- Confiscation order passed with redemption fine of Rs. 35,000/- and penalties.Show Cause Notices:- First notice for seized goods, second notice for duty demand and penalties.- Appellant argued second notice time-barred, relying on Supreme Court decisions.Duty Demand and Penalties:- Commissioner (Appeals) upheld orders demanding duty and imposing penalties.- Appellant argued no new facts in second notice, time-barred demand.Confiscation of Goods:- Order of confiscation upheld, but redemption fine and penalties reduced.- Demand of duty sustained for specific period, penalty reduced due to dispute.Reduction of Penalties:- Penalties reduced for seized goods and duty demand period.Appeal Against Orders:- Appellant's submissions considered, penalties on JCPA and deceased person set aside.- Confiscation upheld, but redemption fine and penalties reduced.Conclusion:- Appeals disposed with upheld confiscation, reduced redemption fine and penalties.- Demand of duty sustained for a specific period with reduced penalty.