Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellant was entitled to be furnished with the details of the bonds and bank guarantees enforced by the department pursuant to the earlier setting aside of the duty demand.
Analysis: The duty demand had earlier been set aside and the Revenue was left at liberty to enforce the bond, if any, in accordance with law. In the subsequent enforcement action, the department adjusted refund amounts and invoked the available bonds and bank guarantees. The appellant disputed the manner of enforcement and asserted absence of disclosure regarding the bonds enforced. In these circumstances, the request for particulars of the enforced securities was found to be justified.
Conclusion: The appellant was entitled to the details of the bonds enforced, and the original adjudicating authority was directed to furnish them.
Final Conclusion: Limited procedural relief was granted to the appellant by requiring disclosure of the securities invoked by the department.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a department enforces bonds or bank guarantees pursuant to an earlier order, the affected party is entitled to disclosure of the particulars of the securities invoked.