Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Sales Tax Upheld on Works Contracts: Court Rules in Favor of Tax Authorities</h1> <h3>SS. Photographic Lab. Pvt. Ltd. Versus State Of Assam And Ors.</h3> The court upheld the assessments and demands made by the respondent authorities under the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993, in a case involving the ... Contract is to render a service, if such a contract is a works contract, the States are empowered to levy a sales tax on the material used therein. Issues Involved:1. Imposed liability to tax under the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993.2. Whether the petitioners' business transactions constitute a 'works contract' under the Act.3. Applicability of Article 366(29A) of the Constitution of India.4. Validity of the assessments and demands made by the respondent authorities.Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:1. Imposed liability to tax under the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993:The petitioners challenged the tax liability imposed under the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993, for different assessment periods. They argued that their business transactions did not involve any sale of goods or transfer of property in goods as understood under Section 8(1)(e) of the Act. Despite their contentions, the respondent authorities assessed and raised demands for various amounts for the years 1993-94 to 1998-99 based on the materials available from their books of accounts.2. Whether the petitioners' business transactions constitute a 'works contract' under the Act:The petitioners contended that their business transactions were exclusively service-based and did not involve any transfer of property in goods. They argued that the activities in their laboratory were service contracts inseparable from the materials like paper and chemicals used in the process. However, the respondent authorities held that the petitioners were engaged in 'works contract' as defined under Section 2(38)(iv) of the Act, and thus chargeable to tax under Section 8(1)(e) of the Act, in view of Article 366(29A) of the Constitution of India and entry No. 24 of Schedule VI of the Act.3. Applicability of Article 366(29A) of the Constitution of India:The petitioners argued that their business transactions did not involve any transfer of property in goods and thus were not taxable under the Act. However, the respondent authorities maintained that following the Constitution (Forty-sixth Amendment) Act, 1982, Clause (29A) of Article 366 was inserted, defining 'tax on sale or purchase of goods' to include a tax on the transfer of property in goods involved in the execution of a works contract. This amendment empowered the State to levy sales tax on the value of goods involved in a works contract, even if the dominant intention of the contract was the rendering of a service.4. Validity of the assessments and demands made by the respondent authorities:The court referred to the decision in Associated Cement Companies Ltd., where it was held that even if the dominant intention of the contract is the rendering of a service, the State is empowered to levy sales tax on the materials used in such a contract after the Forty-sixth Amendment. The court concluded that the decision in Rainbow Colour Lab, which the petitioners relied upon, was no longer good law in light of the subsequent decision in Associated Cement Companies Ltd. Consequently, the court upheld the assessments and demands made by the respondent authorities, dismissing the petitions as without merit.Conclusion:The court dismissed the petitions, upholding the assessments and demands made by the respondent authorities under the Assam General Sales Tax Act, 1993. The court found that the petitioners' business transactions constituted a 'works contract' and were thus taxable under the Act, in view of Article 366(29A) of the Constitution of India. The court also noted that the decision in Rainbow Colour Lab was overruled by implication by the decision in Associated Cement Companies Ltd., which allowed the State to levy sales tax on materials used in a works contract even if the dominant intention was the rendering of a service.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found