2007 (2) TMI 575 - HC - Income Tax

Registration under Section 12AA doesn't automatically exclude income from tax liability determination, only provides eligibility for exemption claims.

HC held that registration under section 12AA does not automatically entitle an assessee to income exclusion from the previous year for tax liability ... Entitlement to Registration under Section 12AA - income from school fees and interest on FDRs - genuineness of the activities - non-deduction of provident fund from the salary paid to certain employees - Whether registration under section 12AA does not necessarily entitle assessee to get income excluded from income of previous year for purpose of determination of tax liability, but it only entitles assessee to claim such exemption, which otherwise could not be claimed in absence of registration - Held that:- Section 12 also only says that any voluntary contributions received by a trust created wholly for charitable or religious purposes or by an institution established wholly for such purposes, shall for the purposes of section 11 be deemed to be income derived from property held under trust wholly for charitable or religious purposes and the provisions of that section and section 13 shall apply accordingly. A cumulative reading of the aforesaid provisions leaves no manner of doubt that exemption under the aforesaid provisions can be claimed with respect to the income derived by the trust or the institution, which is being run for a charitable purpose and, therefore, while considering the registration under section 12AA, the scope of enquiry of the Commissioner, would be limited to the aforesaid extent. The enquiry by the Commissioner shall remain restricted to the examina-tion, as to whether the assessee, who has moved the application for registration under section 12A, is actually in the activities which are genuine. Genuineness of the activities of the trust or the institution has to be seen, keeping in mind the objects thereof, which necessarily means that the Commissioner shall satisfy himself about the fact that the activities are genuine and in consonance with the objects of the trust or the institution. In other words, if establishing and running a school is the object of the Society, as given in its bye-laws, it has to be satisfied that the Society has established the school, where education is being imparted as per rules and the factum of establishment and running school is a genuine activity. The enquiry regarding genuineness of the activities cannot be stretched beyond this. We thus find that the objects of the Society were well in consonance with the scheme of the Act. The Tribunal has rightly found that Nav Chetna Kendra is a Society, which has been formed for maintaining the library for the benefit of the students, being run by the assessee Society and if the books of high standard have been purchased, it cannot be presumed that no purchase was made nor it is the case of the revenue that books worth the amount were not purchased or the payments were not made. It has also not been disputed by the revenue that Nav Chetna Kendra, a Society which has been formed only for running the library for the institution, is not running the library. There is nothing on record to show that money so advanced was for personal benefit of any office bearers of the assessee Society or any other person. It not being in dispute that Nav Chetna Kendra Society runs the library of the institution, an object related to charitable purpose, where the money has been advanced by the assessee Society in furtherance of the said object i.e. for running a library, which is again an educational purpose, it cannot be a ground for refusing registration of the assessee Society. There is no finding that the aforesaid activities of the Society were not genuine. So far the non-deduction of provident fund from the salary paid to certain employees is concerned, that in itself again would not constitute a ground for rejection, as no such requirement stands spelt out from provisions of section 12AA nor it makes the activities of the institution as non-genuine. In case the institution has defaulted or defaults in the matter of depositing, contributions of the employees’ provident fund, the Act concerned shall take care of such default but in no case it can be a ground for refusal of registration. The objects of the assessee Society undoubtedly are for charitable purposes and not against public policy. The genuineness of its activities is proved by the aforesaid facts, which conclusively show that the Society has established a school for the children in the year 1982 and thereafter it has opened its two more branches raising the standard of the school up to CBSE, Delhi Board and subsequently up to Class XII, with a large number of students and sufficient staff to whom salary is being paid. The activities aforesaid cannot be doubted nor can be said to be non-genuine within the meaning of the provisions of section 12AA. The scheme of section 12A and section 12AA does not allow any person/trust or institution to take benefit of the provisions of section 11, section 12, as the case may be, unless registration under section 12AA is obtained and that sub-clause (3) of section 12AA puts complete control over the activities of the trust or the institution and if it is found at any subsequent stage, that its activities are not being carried as per the objects or they do not remain genuine, action for cancellation of registration can be taken. Thus, we do not find any illegality or infirmity in the order passed by the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. The appeal has no force, which is hereby dismissed. 1. ISSUES PRESENTED and CONSIDEREDThe core legal questions considered in this judgment are:(a) Whether the assessee Society, running educational institutions, is entitled to registration under section 12AA of the Income-tax Act, which is a prerequisite for claiming exemption under sections 11 and 12 of the Act.(b) The scope and extent of the Commissioner of Income-tax's authority and inquiry while considering an application for registration under section 12AA, specifically regarding the genuineness of the activities of the trust or institution.(c) Whether the Commissioner can refuse registration on grounds such as alleged misuse of funds, non-deduction of provident fund, irregularities in accounts, or transactions with related societies.(d) The interpretation and application of sections 11, 12, 12A, 12AA, and 13 of the Income-tax Act concerning charitable trusts and institutions, particularly educational societies.(e) The legal consequences of refusal or grant of registration under section 12AA on the entitlement to claim exemption under sections 11 and 12.2. ISSUE-WISE DETAILED ANALYSISIssue (a): Entitlement to Registration under Section 12AALegal Framework and Precedents: Section 12AA prescribes the procedure for registration of trusts or institutions under the Income-tax Act. Registration is mandatory for claiming exemption under sections 11 and 12. The Commissioner must be satisfied about the genuineness of the objects and activities of the trust or institution.Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The Court emphasized that registration under section 12AA is a prerequisite but does not itself guarantee exemption. The Commissioner's role is to verify that the objects are not against public policy and that the activities are genuine and in consonance with those objects.Key Evidence and Findings: The assessee Society was established in 1981-82 and runs multiple educational institutions affiliated with CBSE up to Class XII. The objects of the Society, including mental, social, physical, and educational development of children, were found to be charitable and not against public policy.Application of Law to Facts: The Tribunal and the Court found the objects and activities genuine. The Society's establishment and running of schools, library facilities, and other educational activities were consistent with its objects.Treatment of Competing Arguments: The Revenue argued that irregularities such as transactions with related societies and non-deduction of provident fund justified refusal. The Court rejected these grounds as insufficient to deny registration, noting that such matters could be dealt with during assessment proceedings, not at the registration stage.Conclusions: The Society was entitled to registration under section 12AA as its objects and activities were genuine and charitable in nature.Issue (b): Scope of Inquiry by Commissioner under Section 12AALegal Framework and Precedents: Section 12AA(1) empowers the Commissioner to call for documents and make inquiries to satisfy himself about the genuineness of the objects and activities. However, the scope is limited to verifying genuineness and compliance with public policy, not detailed scrutiny of income application or profit-making.Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The Court clarified that the Commissioner's inquiry must be confined to ensuring that the objects are charitable and not against public policy, and that the activities are genuine and not a facade. The Commissioner cannot refuse registration merely on presumptions or surmises about misuse of income or profit earning.Key Evidence and Findings: The Commissioner's refusal based on alleged misuse of emergent work powers, purchase of high-standard books through a related society, and non-deduction of provident fund was found to exceed the permissible scope of inquiry.Application of Law to Facts: The Court held that the Commissioner's role is not to assess whether the income is applied strictly for charitable purposes or to audit accounts in detail at the registration stage. Such scrutiny belongs to assessment proceedings under sections 11 and 13.Treatment of Competing Arguments: Revenue's argument for wide-ranging inquiry was rejected. The Court emphasized that registration is a preliminary procedural step, and detailed assessment of income application and compliance is to be done by the Assessing Officer during assessment.Conclusions: The Commissioner's inquiry under section 12AA must be limited to verifying genuineness of objects and activities, and not extend to detailed financial scrutiny or assessment of income application.Issue (c): Grounds for Refusal of RegistrationLegal Framework and Precedents: The Commissioner may refuse registration if objects are against public policy or activities are not genuine. Section 12AA(1)(b)(ii) mandates a reasonable opportunity of hearing before refusal.Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The Court found that the grounds relied upon by the Commissioner-the unbridled power under emergent work clause, purchase of books through a related society, non-reconciliation of balance sheets, and non-deduction of provident fund-were not sufficient to refuse registration.Key Evidence and Findings: The emergent work clause was read in context and found to be limited to ancillary activities related to the main charitable objects. The purchase of books through Nav Chetna Kendra, a related society running the library, was legitimate and not a misuse. The balance sheets were later audited and discrepancies resolved. Non-deduction of provident fund was a compliance issue, not affecting genuineness of activities.Application of Law to Facts: None of the alleged irregularities demonstrated that the Society's activities were not genuine or against its objects. The Court held that such issues could be addressed during assessment or through other legal mechanisms.Treatment of Competing Arguments: Revenue's reliance on these grounds was dismissed as speculative or irrelevant for registration purposes.Conclusions: The Commissioner's refusal on these grounds was not justified.Issue (d): Interpretation of Sections 11, 12, 12A, 12AA and 13Legal Framework and Precedents: Sections 11 and 12 provide exemption from income tax for income derived from property held for charitable or religious purposes, subject to conditions. Section 12A mandates registration under section 12AA as a condition precedent to claim such exemption. Section 13 excludes exemption in certain cases involving substantial contributors, trustees, or relatives.Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The Court explained that registration under section 12AA is a procedural condition that allows a trust or institution to claim exemption under sections 11 and 12. However, registration does not guarantee exemption; the Assessing Officer must verify the application of income to charitable purposes during assessment.Key Evidence and Findings: The Court noted that the provisions ensure that only genuine charitable trusts or institutions benefit from exemption, and that the Commissioner's role is limited to verifying genuineness of objects and activities at the registration stage.Application of Law to Facts: The Society's registration application satisfied the conditions under section 12AA, and the objects and activities met the requirements for charitable purposes under sections 11 and 12.Treatment of Competing Arguments: The Court rejected the Revenue's contention that registration could be refused based on detailed financial or operational scrutiny, which is the domain of the assessment proceedings.Conclusions: The statutory scheme clearly separates the registration process from the assessment of exemption claims.Issue (e): Consequences of Refusal or Grant of RegistrationLegal Framework and Precedents: Section 12A disallows applicability of sections 11 and 12 unless registration under section 12AA is obtained. Section 12AA(3) allows cancellation of registration if activities are found not genuine subsequently.Court's Interpretation and Reasoning: The Court held that refusal of registration denies the trust the right to claim exemption under sections 11 and 12, regardless of the actual charitable nature of its activities. Conversely, grant of registration enables the trust to claim exemption, subject to verification during assessment.Key Evidence and Findings: The Court noted that the registration process is protective, ensuring only genuine charitable trusts receive exemption privileges, but it is not a substitute for detailed tax assessment.Application of Law to Facts: The assessee Society, having established genuineness of objects and activities, was rightly granted registration by the Tribunal.Treatment of Competing Arguments: The Revenue's appeal against the Tribunal's order allowing registration was dismissed.Conclusions: Registration under section 12AA is a necessary but not sufficient condition for exemption; refusal of registration precludes exemption claims, but such refusal must be based on valid grounds within the limited scope of inquiry.3. SIGNIFICANT HOLDINGS'The Commissioner has to satisfy himself about the genuineness of the activities of the trust or institution and also about the objects of the trust or the institution. On being satisfied about the genuineness of the activities and the objects, the Commissioner shall pass an order registering the trust or institution; if not, he shall refuse registration.''The scope of enquiry by the Commissioner under section 12AA is limited to ensuring that the objects of the trust are not against public policy and that the activities are genuine and in consonance with the objects. It does not extend to detailed scrutiny of income application or financial irregularities.''Mere registration under section 12AA does not confer exemption under sections 11 and 12; it only entitles the trust or institution to claim exemption, which is subject to verification by the Assessing Officer during assessment proceedings.''Refusal of registration under section 12AA must be based on valid grounds relating to the genuineness of objects or activities, and cannot be based on surmises, presumptions, or issues that are to be dealt with during assessment.''The objects of the Society, including educational activities from primary to degree level, library facilities, and physical and mental development of children, constitute charitable purposes and are not against public policy.''Non-deduction of provident fund contributions and transactions with related societies, without evidence of misuse or personal benefit, do not constitute grounds for refusal of registration.''Section 12AA(3) empowers the Commissioner to cancel registration if activities are subsequently found not genuine or not in accordance with objects, providing a safeguard against misuse.''The scheme of sections 11, 12, 12A, and 12AA reflects a two-stage process: registration to enable exemption claims, and assessment to verify application of income to charitable purposes.'