Drawback-related jurisdiction bars Tribunal hearing where misdeclaration triggers penalty and redemption fine issues.

Misdeclaration of exported goods led to disallowance of drawback, penalty, and consideration of redemption fine. The Tribunal noted that disputes arising from drawback claims and the connected penal action were governed by the jurisdictional scheme placing such matters before the Government of India, not the Tribunal. On that basis, the appeal was treated as not maintainable before the Tribunal for want of jurisdiction.

---

---

Issues: Whether the appeal before the Tribunal was maintainable in view of the jurisdictional scheme governing drawback-related matters and the connected penal action.

Analysis: The appeal arose from misdeclaration of exported goods resulting in disallowance of drawback, imposition of penalty, and the question of redemption fine. The Tribunal held that the dispute was intrinsically linked to the drawback claim and the consequential penalty, and that such matters fell within the jurisdiction of the Government of India rather than the Tribunal.

Conclusion: The appeal was held to be not maintainable before the Tribunal for want of jurisdiction.

---