TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal modifies stay order due to appellant's asset seizure, sets early hearing date.</h1> <h3>PRIME POLYWEAVE LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX. & CUS., SURAT-II</h3> PRIME POLYWEAVE LTD. Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX. & CUS., SURAT-II - 2009 (236) E.L.T. 522 (Tri. - Ahmd.) Issues: Compliance with deposit order, modification of stay order, possession of assets by Bank of Maharashtra, early hearing dateCompliance with deposit order: The judgment pertains to an order directing the appellant to deposit Rs. 7 lakhs within 8 weeks, with a compliance report. Upon the matter being called for compliance, neither the appellant nor a compliance report was present. However, the appellant had filed a miscellaneous application citing that their assets were taken over by Bank of Maharashtra under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The Panchnama recorded the closure of the factory, inventory preparation, and the Bank's possession of the properties.Modification of stay order: Considering the appellant's situation, the Tribunal modified the stay order unconditionally due to the difficulty in depositing Rs. 7 lakhs in cash. The Tribunal acknowledged the possession of assets by the Bank of Maharashtra and allowed the stay petition without conditions. The Tribunal also scheduled an early hearing for the appeal due to the involvement of revenue amounting to Rs. 20 lakhs.Possession of assets by Bank of Maharashtra: The appellant's movable and immovable assets were taken over by the Bank of Maharashtra under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002. The Panchnama detailed the closure of the factory, preparation of Plant & Machinery inventory, and the Bank's possession of the properties, leading to the Tribunal's decision to modify the stay order unconditionally.Early hearing date: Given the involvement of a substantial revenue amount of Rs. 20 lakhs, the Tribunal fixed an early hearing date for the appeal on 22-10-2007 to address the case promptly and efficiently. The decision to expedite the hearing process was made in light of the financial implications and the modified stay order allowing the appellant relief from the deposit requirement.
TaxTMI 