Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2002 (2) TMI 40 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Court rules in favor of appellant in KVS Scheme dispute, correct computation at Rs.8,886. Payments for tax arrears accounted as part payment. The court ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the correct computation under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme (KVS Scheme) was Rs.8,886, not the ...
                        Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                            Court rules in favor of appellant in KVS Scheme dispute, correct computation at Rs.8,886. Payments for tax arrears accounted as part payment.

                            The court ruled in favor of the appellant, finding that the correct computation under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme (KVS Scheme) was Rs.8,886, not the Rs.65,592 claimed by the respondent. Additionally, the court held that payments made towards tax arrears should be considered as part payment towards tax under the KVS Scheme, rather than being solely adjusted towards interest. The appellant's appeal was allowed, the respondent's order was set aside, and a fresh certificate of intimation was directed to be issued, with the appellant also awarded costs of the writ petition and appeal.




                            Issues involved:
                            1. Correct computation under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme (KVS Scheme).
                            2. Appropriation of payments towards tax or interest under the KVS Scheme.

                            Detailed Analysis:

                            1. Correct computation under the Kar Vivad Samadhan Scheme (KVS Scheme):

                            The petitioner, an assessee under the Income-tax Act, 1961, filed a declaration under the KVS Scheme for the assessment year 1995-96, showing a computation of tax payable as Rs.8,886. The respondent, however, issued a certificate indicating that Rs.65,592 was payable. The appellant challenged this computation, leading to a dispute over the correct amount payable under the KVS Scheme.

                            The court examined the relevant provisions of the KVS Scheme as contained in the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998. Section 88(a)(iii) of the Finance Act specifies that the amount payable by a declarant (other than companies and firms) under the KVS Scheme shall be 30% of the disputed income where tax arrears include income-tax and interest or penalty. The "disputed income" is defined in section 87(e) as the portion of total income relatable to the disputed tax, and "disputed tax" is the total tax determined and payable but remains unpaid as of the declaration date.

                            The court concluded that the appellant correctly calculated the amount payable under the KVS Scheme. The total income determined was Rs.2,59,600, and the aggregate of all taxes paid before the declaration was Rs.66,993. The disputed tax was Rs.11,847, and the corresponding disputed income was Rs.29,620. Therefore, the tax payable under the scheme was 30% of Rs.29,620, amounting to Rs.8,886.

                            2. Appropriation of payments towards tax or interest under the KVS Scheme:

                            The Department contended that the sum of Rs.60,000 paid by the appellant towards tax arrears should be adjusted towards interest due under sections 234A, 234B, and 234C of the Income-tax Act, as per the Explanation to section 140A(1). This would result in a higher amount payable under the KVS Scheme.

                            The court, however, held that the provisions of section 88 of the Finance (No. 2) Act, 1998, prevail over section 140A of the Income-tax Act. Payments made towards tax arrears during the pendency of litigation should be considered as part payment towards tax for the purposes of the KVS Scheme. The court referred to the clarifications issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT), which stated that part payments are appropriated first towards tax and then towards interest.

                            The court emphasized that the KVS Scheme aimed to resolve tax disputes and provide waiver of interest and penalty on payment of a portion of the disputed income. Therefore, the normal rule of adjusting payments first towards interest does not apply under the KVS Scheme.

                            Conclusion:

                            The court allowed the appeal, setting aside the order of the learned single judge and quashing the certificate of intimation issued by the respondent. The respondent was directed to issue a fresh certificate of intimation, accepting the appellant's declaration under the KVS Scheme. The appellant was also entitled to costs of the writ petition and the appeal.
                            Full Summary is available for active users!
                            Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                            Topics

                            ActsIncome Tax
                            No Records Found