High Court rules against ITAT, denies bank's 35B relief, cites Finance Act changes. The High Court of Madras held that the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal erred in instructing the Assessing Officer to recalculate the D.I.T. relief without ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
High Court rules against ITAT, denies bank's 35B relief, cites Finance Act changes.
The High Court of Madras held that the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal erred in instructing the Assessing Officer to recalculate the D.I.T. relief without deducting the section 35B deduction for a bank with a Bangkok branch. The court determined that the bank was not eligible for relief under section 35B for the 1984-85 assessment year, citing amendments introduced by the Finance Act, 1983.
The High Court of Madras ruled that the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal was wrong in directing the Assessing Officer to recompute the D.I.T. relief without reducing the deduction under section 35B for a bank with a branch in Bangkok. The court found that the bank was not entitled to claim any relief under section 35B for the assessment year 1984-85 due to changes in the law brought about by the Finance Act, 1983.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.