1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>CESTAT grants stay on refund order due to non-compliance with Notification 56/02. Manufacturer's payment method invalid.</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi granted a stay of operation of the impugned order in a case where the revenue filed an application stating that a ... Stay of order - Refund The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, New Delhi granted a stay of operation of the impugned order in a case where the revenue filed an application stating that a refund was allowed in violation of the conditions of Notification No. 56/02. The condition of the notification required the manufacturer to first utilize the whole Cenvat credit available for payment of duty on goods cleared during the month. Despite having a balance in their Cenvat account, the manufacturer paid duty through their PLA and requested a refund, which was deemed impermissible. The operation of the impugned order was stayed during the appeal process, with the appeal scheduled for regular hearing on 27-5-2008.