Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Notification No. 47/01 Clarificatory, Retrospective Application Upheld

        PREMRAJ INDUSTRIES Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., PUNE-III

        PREMRAJ INDUSTRIES Versus COMMISSIONER OF C. EX., PUNE-III - 2008 (226) E.L.T. 93 (Tri. - Mumbai) Issues Involved:
        1. Eligibility of the appellant to avail the benefit of Notification No. 8/01-C.E.
        2. Classification of the appellant's products under the correct Chapter Heading.
        3. Applicability of Notification No. 47/01 retrospectively or prospectively.

        Detailed Analysis:

        Issue 1: Eligibility to Avail the Benefit of Notification No. 8/01-C.E.
        The primary issue is whether the appellant can avail the benefit of Notification No. 8/01-C.E. The adjudicating authority denied this benefit on the grounds that the appellant's products fall under Chapter Heading 9306, which is not included in Notification No. 8/01. The appellant argued that Notification No. 47/01, which amended Notification No. 8/01 to include Chapter 9306, should apply retrospectively. The Tribunal, referring to the case of Mahapravu Moulding Works v. CCE, Kolkata-II, concluded that Notification No. 47/01 is clarificatory in nature and thus applies retrospectively. Consequently, the appellant is eligible for the benefits under Notification No. 8/01.

        Issue 2: Classification of the Products
        The appellant contended that their products (Plunger, Plunger guide, Ignition Element, Inner Case) should be classified under Chapter Heading 36.03 as parts of products used in ammunition, rather than under Chapter Heading 9306. The Tribunal examined the HSN Explanatory Notes and found that the products, being parts without any explosive or inflammable charges, do not fall under Chapter 9306 or 36.03. Instead, they should be classified according to their base material, which would place them under the respective headings for basic metals (e.g., Chapter 74 for articles of brass). Thus, the Tribunal accepted the appellant's contention and reclassified the products under the appropriate chapter headings for basic metals.

        Issue 3: Applicability of Notification No. 47/01
        The Tribunal needed to determine whether Notification No. 47/01, which amended Notification No. 8/01 to include Chapter 9306, applies retrospectively. By referencing the Tribunal's decision in Mahapravu Moulding Works and the Supreme Court's decision in WPLL Ltd. v. CCE, Meerut, the Tribunal concluded that Notification No. 47/01 is clarificatory and thus applies retrospectively. This means that the clearances made by the appellant between 1-4-2001 and 30-9-2001 are eligible for the SSI exemption under Notification No. 8/01 as amended by Notification No. 47/01.

        Conclusion:
        The Tribunal held that Notification No. 47/01 is clarificatory and applies retrospectively, thereby allowing the appellant to avail the benefits of Notification No. 8/01. The products manufactured by the appellant should be classified under the respective headings for basic metals, not under Chapter 9306 or 36.03. Consequently, the appeal filed by the appellant was allowed, and the impugned order was set aside.

        Final Judgment:
        The appeal filed by the appellant is allowed in toto, and the impugned order is set aside.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found