Pre-deposit order kept inoperative where appeal raised a debatable legal controversy pending expeditious disposal.

A debatable legal controversy requiring merits hearing was found unsuitable for conclusive determination in a miscellaneous application, so the Tribunal kept the pre-deposit order inoperative as an interim measure to avoid prejudice pending expeditious disposal of the appeal. The request for modification was therefore allowed, and interim relief was granted to the appellant while the appeal was listed for early hearing.

---

---

Issues: Whether the interim order directing pre-deposit required modification and whether the impugned order should remain inoperative as an interim measure pending disposal of the appeal.

Analysis: The dispute involved conflicting Tribunal orders and required detailed consideration at the stage of final hearing. The matter was unsuitable for conclusive examination in a miscellaneous application. In view of the legal controversy and the need to prevent public mischief, the existing interim arrangement was reconsidered. The order of pre-deposit was therefore directed to remain inoperative as an interim measure, and the appeal was ordered to be taken up for expeditious disposal.

Conclusion: The request for modification was allowed and interim relief was granted in favour of the appellant.

Final Conclusion: The interim burden on the appellant was lifted pending early hearing of the appeal.

Ratio Decidendi: Where an appeal raises a debatable legal controversy requiring merits hearing, the Tribunal may keep a pre-deposit order inoperative as an interim measure to avoid prejudice pending expeditious disposal.

---