Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether steel plain plates used for fabrication of the chimney of a glass furnace were eligible capital goods for availing Modvat/Cenvat credit under the applicable excise law.
Analysis: The credit claim was examined in the light of the statutory definition of capital goods under Rule 57Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 and the settled principle that eligibility depends on whether the goods are used in or in relation to the manufacture of the final product. The furnace was treated as eligible capital goods for the relevant period, and the plain plates were used in fabrication of its chimney. The fact that the furnace or part of it was immovable did not by itself defeat credit entitlement where the goods were integrally connected with manufacture.
Conclusion: The steel plain plates qualified for credit as capital goods used in relation to manufacture, and the Revenue's challenge was rejected.
Final Conclusion: The impugned order allowing credit was sustained, and the Revenue's appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Materials used in fabrication of an integral part of eligible manufacturing equipment are entitled to credit where they are used in or in relation to the manufacture of the final product, and immovability of the equipment does not by itself bar such credit.