Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether gases manufactured and then vented into the atmosphere within the factory premises were liable to excise duty, and whether the departmental authorities were bound by the Board circular clarifying non-liability.
Analysis: The circular clarified that gases falling under Chapters 28 and 29, when produced in a factory and allowed to escape into the atmosphere, were not to be regarded as manufactured products amounting to clearance and were not liable to duty. The record showed that the gases were vented out and the Revenue did not establish receipt of any consideration for the vented quantity. The impugned demand was therefore inconsistent with the circular, which was binding on the departmental authorities.
Conclusion: The gases vented into the atmosphere were not liable to excise duty, and the demand could not be sustained. The appeal succeeded in favour of the assessee.