1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appellate Tribunal allows inclusion of FDZ charges in assessable value; compliance with Central Excise Rules upheld</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that Free Delivery Zone (FDZ) charges could be included in the assessable ... Valuation - Free Delivery Zone (FDZ) charges - includibility - Held that: - In view of the fact that FDZ charges are separately shown along with the RPO charges, the charges have been transparently collected and included in the invoice as per the direction of the OCC. Hence, we are of opinion that the requirement at the material time under Rule 5 of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 2000 that transport charges should be separately shown, has been met - we find no reason to uphold the impugned Order including FDZ charges in the assessable value - appeal allowed - decided in favor of appellant. The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Kolkata ruled in favor of the appellant regarding the inclusion of Free Delivery Zone (FDZ) charges in the assessable value of goods delivered to petrol pumps. The tribunal found that since the FDZ charges were transparently collected and separately shown in the invoice as per the direction of the Oil Coordination Committee (OCC), the requirement under Rule 5 of the Central Excise (Valuation) Rules, 2000 was met. The impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was allowed with consequential relief to the appellants. The Cross Objection filed by the Department was disposed of.