Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether petroleum products lying in bond when the warehousing facility was withdrawn could be denied the benefit of exemption on subsequent clearance to an EOU, and whether the demand of duty and consequential penalties were sustainable.
Analysis: The goods were already in warehouse when the warehousing facility was withdrawn, and their later removal was to an EOU under an exemption notification covering such clearances. The interpretation adopted by the department would defeat the benefit of the exemption notification and deprive the assessee of a relief that would otherwise have been available on clearance to the EOU. The Tribunal also noted that a coordinate Bench had already taken the same view in a similar matter involving the same assessee.
Conclusion: The demand of duty and penalties were not sustainable, and the appeals were allowed in favour of the assessee.