TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether deduction under section 36(1)(viia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is to be computed after reducing deduction under section 36(1)(viii), and whether receipts such as lease rentals, consultancy and allied receipts form part of profits derived from long term finance for section 36(1)(viii); (ii) Whether depreciation on leased assets and the claim relating to bad debts/provision for bad and doubtful debts were allowable in the manner claimed; (iii) Whether expenditure on increase in authorised capital, write-off of diminution in value of investments, and claim relating to discarded assets were allowable; (iv) Whether interest on non-performing assets and sticky loans could be brought to tax on accrual basis and whether the reassessment suffered from breach of natural justice.
Issue (i): Whether deduction under section 36(1)(viia) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is to be computed after reducing deduction under section 36(1)(viii), and whether receipts such as lease rentals, consultancy and allied receipts form part of profits derived from long term finance for section 36(1)(viii).
Analysis: The provisions of section 36(1)(viia) required computation of the deduction on total income before making deduction under that clause and Chapter VIA, and the deduction under section 36(1)(viii) was therefore to be reduced first. For section 36(1)(viii), the controlling expression was profits derived from the business of providing long term finance, and only receipts directly referable to such finance could qualify. Receipts like lease rentals, consultancy fees, guarantee commission, appraisal fees, financial charges, dividends, profit on sale of investments and similar items were not treated as income derived from long term finance. Interest on debentures required factual verification as to whether the repayment period satisfied the statutory definition of long term finance.
Conclusion: The assessee's challenge failed on the sequencing of sections 36(1)(viia) and 36(1)(viii), and most ancillary receipts were excluded from section 36(1)(viii); the issue of interest on debentures was remitted for verification, so the relief was only partial.
Issue (ii): Whether depreciation on leased assets and the claim relating to bad debts/provision for bad and doubtful debts were allowable in the manner claimed.
Analysis: Depreciation on the leased assets was allowed by following the earlier year's order in the assessee's own case, the Department having failed to establish that the transaction was merely paper-based. On bad debts, the opening credit balance in the provision for bad and doubtful debts account could be adjusted, but the provision created in the current year could not be deducted from the current year's write-off for the purpose of section 36(1)(vii); that amount was to be considered in the succeeding year.
Conclusion: Depreciation on the leased assets was allowed, while the bad debt adjustment was allowed only to the extent of the opening balance and not the current year's provision.
Issue (iii): Whether expenditure on increase in authorised capital, write-off of diminution in value of investments, and claim relating to discarded assets were allowable.
Analysis: Expenditure incurred for increasing authorised capital was held to be capital in nature on the facts, and the contrary reliance placed on a case dealing with bonus issue was found inapplicable. The write-off of shares held as investments was not allowed as business loss or capital loss because the shares were not stock-in-trade and there was no transfer attracting section 45. As to discarded assets, section 32(1)(iii) was held inapplicable outside the special regime contemplated thereunder, but the alternate claim for depreciation under the block of assets system was accepted.
Conclusion: The capital-raising expenditure and the write-off of diminution in investment were disallowed, while the alternate depreciation claim on discarded assets was allowed.
Issue (iv): Whether interest on non-performing assets and sticky loans could be brought to tax on accrual basis and whether the reassessment suffered from breach of natural justice.
Analysis: For a notified public financial institution, interest on non-performing assets was governed by section 43D and Rule 6EA, so such interest was taxable only on receipt basis or when credited to the profit and loss account, whichever was earlier. Since the relevant interest had neither been received nor credited, accrual taxation was rejected. In the reassessment concerning depreciation, material collected behind the assessee's back had not been properly confronted before completion of assessment, so the matter was remitted for fresh decision after giving adequate opportunity, including cross-examination where relevant.
Conclusion: The addition of interest on non-performing assets was deleted, and the reassessment issue was remanded for fresh adjudication after complying with natural justice.
Final Conclusion: The assessees succeeded on some major issues, including depreciation on leased assets and deletion of interest additions on non-performing assets, but failed on several deduction and expenditure claims, with certain matters sent back for limited reconsideration. The revenue's appeals were dismissed.
Ratio Decidendi: For a specified financial institution, deduction under section 36(1)(viia) is to be computed after giving effect to section 36(1)(viii), only profits directly derived from long term finance qualify for section 36(1)(viii), and interest on non-performing assets is not taxable on accrual basis where section 43D applies.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
