1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>CESTAT Remands Duty Demand Case for Fresh Proceedings</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai remanded a case concerning a duty demand based on the actual clearance weight of goods, following a discrepancy in ... Demand - Discrepancy in quantity of goods Issues: Discrepancy in weight of cleared goods, duty demand based on actual clearance weight, application of case law, remand for de novo proceedings.In this judgment by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai, the issue revolves around a discrepancy in the weight of goods cleared as per invoices and the actual weighment register. The audit party discovered this difference during a surprise check, leading to a show cause notice demanding duty based on the actual clearances made. The Order-in-original favored the department, but the Commissioner (Appeals) exonerated the assessee by applying a principle from a previous case. The department argued that duty should be paid based on the actual clearance weight, citing a Tribunal decision in a similar case where duty was imposed according to actual weighment, emphasizing the absence of any trade practice for sending goods in excess weight or shortage.The Tribunal, after considering the arguments, decided to remand the matter back to the Commissioner (Appeals) for fresh proceedings. The Commissioner (Appeals) is directed to consider all submissions from both parties, including the case law presented during the hearing. By remanding the case, all issues are left open for further examination. Consequently, the appeal is allowed for remand in the specified terms, providing an opportunity for a comprehensive review of the case with all relevant factors considered for a fair decision.