TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Assessee denied car depreciation without proof of business use. Tribunal decision overturned.</h1> The High Court of Madras held that the assessee was not entitled to depreciation for motor cars as there was no evidence of their business use. The ... 'Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal is right in law in directing that the assessee is entitled to depreciation in respect of the ten motor cars purchased on March 30, 1989, and March 31, 1989, even though the assessee had not proved the fact that the assets were used for the purpose of business during the relevant accounting year?' The question referred to us is answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee. The High Court of Madras ruled that the assessee was not entitled to depreciation for ten motor cars purchased at the end of the accounting year as there was no proof of them being used for business purposes. The Tribunal's decision to allow depreciation was deemed incorrect. The judgment favored the Revenue over the assessee.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
