Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>High Court denies deduction for technical director's salary under Income-tax Act due to services being rendered in India.</h1> <h3>Commissioner of Income-Tax Versus Registhan Pvt. Ltd.</h3> The High Court ruled against the assessee, disallowing the weighted deduction on the technical director's salary under section 35B of the Income-tax Act, ... Weighted deduction under section 35B - technical director's salary - The condition precedent for weighted deduction on a salary of the person is that he should perform the services outside India. Admittedly, the technical director had rendered the services in India and not outside India and when the services had been rendered by the director in India and he has been paid the salary for the same in India, the payment does not come under sub-clause (viii) of sub-section (1)(b) of section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Merely because his services have some connection with export, his salary is not eligible for weighted deduction, as required under sub-clause (viii) of sub-section (1)(b) of section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. Tribunal was not justified in holding that weighted deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, is admissible on technical director's salary Issues:1. Interpretation of section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961 regarding weighted deduction on technical director's salary.Analysis:The case involved a dispute over the admissibility of weighted deduction under section 35B of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on the salary paid to a technical director amounting to Rs. 67,948 by an assessee-company engaged in manufacturing and sale of ready-made garments. The Assessing Officer rejected the claim of the assessee, stating that it did not fall under any sub-clauses of sub-section (1)(b) of section 35B. The Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) upheld this decision. However, the Tribunal allowed the claim, citing sub-clause (viii) of section 35B(1)(b) which pertains to services outside India in connection with export. The Tribunal held that since the salary was paid in India for services rendered in India, it qualified for weighted deduction under sub-clause (viii).The main contention revolved around the interpretation of sub-clause (viii) of section 35B(1)(b), which specifies that services performed outside India in connection with export are eligible for deduction. The Revenue argued that unless services are rendered outside India, weighted deduction on the salary of a technical director is not permissible. They relied on precedents such as CIT v. Hero Cycles (P) Ltd. and Brooke Bond India Ltd. v. CIT to support their stance. On the other hand, the assessee's counsel contended that even if the services were related to export and performed in India, the salary should qualify for deduction under sub-clause (viii). They cited cases like CIT v. Stepwell Industries Ltd. and V. D. Swami and Co. (P) Ltd. v. CIT to bolster their argument.The High Court referred to the judgments in CIT v. Hero Cycles (P) Ltd. and Brooke Bond India Ltd. v. CIT, emphasizing that the weighted deduction under section 35B is subject to specific conditions mentioned in the sub-clauses. The court highlighted that the plain language of sub-clause (viii) requires services to be performed outside India for eligibility. Since the technical director's services were rendered in India, the payment of salary did not meet the criteria for deduction under sub-clause (viii) of section 35B(1)(b). Consequently, the court ruled in favor of the Revenue, stating that the Tribunal erred in allowing weighted deduction on the salary paid to the technical director for services provided in India.In conclusion, the High Court held that the assessee's case did not fall under any sub-clauses of sub-section (1)(b) of section 35B, thereby disallowing the weighted deduction on the technical director's salary. The judgment favored the Revenue and ruled against the assessee, highlighting the importance of meeting the specific criteria outlined in the relevant provisions for claiming deductions under the Income-tax Act, 1961.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found