Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the consultancy payments made to the non-resident for market study and updation were fees for technical services under Article 12(4)(b) of the India-Singapore tax treaty so as to require deduction of tax at source under section 195, and whether the assessee was entitled to refund of tax deducted with interest under section 244A.
Analysis: The payment was for preparation and updation of a market study based on available data, and the record did not show that the services involved any technical knowledge, skill, know-how or process that was made available to the assessee. The relevant treaty provision covered consultancy services only when they made available technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes enabling the recipient to apply the technology contained therein. A mere processing of data or delivery of a report, without transfer of technical capability, did not satisfy that test. In these circumstances, the consultancy charges could not be treated as fees for technical services taxable in India, and the rule of consistency could not override the correct legal position.
Conclusion: The consultancy payment was not taxable as fees for technical services, deduction at source was not warranted, and the assessee was entitled to refund of the tax deducted together with interest under section 244A.