Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appellants made out a prima facie case for waiver of pre-deposit of duty and penalties and for stay of recovery pending appeal.
Analysis: The demand arose from alleged misuse of the DEEC/Advance Licence Scheme in relation to duty-free imports and non-fulfilment of export obligations. The tribunal found prima facie force in the appellants' case that the quantity-based advance licence had been cancelled by the DGFT, that the DEEC book had not been utilised, and that the bills of entry were not shown to have been filed by or under the authority of the appellant. It was also noted that no investigation or finding established that the CHA was authorised by the appellant, despite this being a relevant factual assertion in the proceedings.
Conclusion: The appellants were entitled to waiver of pre-deposit and stay of recovery pending the appeals.