1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appeal Restoration Denied Due to Delay Beyond Prescribed Limit</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai rejected the application for restoration of an appeal due to an unexplained delay of more than 3 1/2 years in ... Appeal - Restoration of appeal The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai rejected the application for restoration of an appeal due to unexplained delay of more than 3 Β½ years in filing the application, which was beyond the prescribed limit of 60 days under Rule 22 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. The appellant had died, and the appeal had abated earlier. The application for restoration was filed by the son of the appellant after the prescribed time limit had passed.