Appeal Restoration Denied Due to Delay Beyond Prescribed Limit The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai rejected the application for restoration of an appeal due to an unexplained delay of more than 3 1/2 years in ...
Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Appeal Restoration Denied Due to Delay Beyond Prescribed Limit
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai rejected the application for restoration of an appeal due to an unexplained delay of more than 3 1/2 years in filing the application, which exceeded the prescribed 60-day limit under Rule 22 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. The appellant had passed away, and the appeal had abated earlier. The son of the appellant filed the application for restoration after the prescribed time limit had lapsed.
The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai rejected the application for restoration of an appeal due to unexplained delay of more than 3 ½ years in filing the application, which was beyond the prescribed limit of 60 days under Rule 22 of the CESTAT (Procedure) Rules, 1982. The appellant had died, and the appeal had abated earlier. The application for restoration was filed by the son of the appellant after the prescribed time limit had passed.
Full Summary is available for active users!
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
