Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether denial of the benefit of Notification No. 38/97-C.E. for want of declaration also justified denial of Modvat credit, when duty on the finished goods was payable at the tariff rate.
Analysis: The assessee was held not entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 38/97-C.E. because the required declaration had not been filed. On that basis, the finished goods became liable to duty at the tariff rate. Once the exemption under the notification was denied and tariff duty became payable, the separate denial of Modvat credit was found unsustainable.
Conclusion: Denial of Modvat credit was set aside and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where exemption under a concessional notification is refused and the goods are assessed to duty at the tariff rate, Modvat credit cannot be denied merely because the assessee failed to satisfy the declaration requirement for that notification.