1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Appellate Tribunal clarifies valuation rules for free pharmaceutical samples</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai allowed an appeal concerning the valuation of free samples of pharmaceutical drugs. It held that assessments should ... Valuation - Physicians samples Issues: Valuation of free samples for pharmaceutical drugs.In this case, the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Mumbai heard an appeal against the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) regarding the valuation of free samples of pharmaceutical drugs. The Assistant Commissioner had levied duty on the free samples based on the value of comparable goods, disallowing deductions claimed for cash discount, quantity discount, freight, and insurance. The Commissioner (Appeals) ruled that abatements for discounts and expenses should be excluded for free samples as well.The Tribunal noted that the physician samples were distributed for free, without any sale involved, leading to no transaction value for the product. Citing a previous order, the Tribunal emphasized that assessments should be based on the normal price of comparable goods. Conditional discounts like cash and quantity discounts applicable to sold goods cannot be extended to free samples. The Assistant Commissioner's finding of no insurance or freight involved in the samples supported the decision that deductions for these expenses were not applicable to free samples.Ultimately, the Tribunal found the Commissioner (Appeals) erred in setting aside the Assistant Commissioner's order, deeming it not legally sound. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, setting aside the Commissioner (Appeals) order and restoring the original order.This judgment clarifies the valuation methodology for free samples of pharmaceutical drugs, emphasizing the need to base assessments on comparable goods' normal prices and excluding conditional discounts and expenses not applicable to free samples.